<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>timjmitchell.com &#187; Productonomics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timjmitchell.com/tags/productonomics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timjmitchell.com</link>
	<description>Digital and Social Media, Product Management, Technology, Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Introducing: Productonomics</title>
		<link>http://timjmitchell.com/2010/05/30/introducing-productonomics/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=introducing-productonomics</link>
		<comments>http://timjmitchell.com/2010/05/30/introducing-productonomics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 23:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productonomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timjmitchell.com/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When it comes to my blog and thinking and writing about things of interest to me (and hopefully others), I obscenely violate of the best practices that I enthusiastically promote to all those I work with &#8211; “generate ideas, quickly share them, iterate, optimize, repeat”.  Well, I’ve decided to stop violating this practice and share [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://timjmitchell.com/2010/05/30/introducing-productonomics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theory, Yes, Grand Theory of Product, No</title>
		<link>http://timjmitchell.com/2010/01/07/theory-yes-grand-theory-of-product-no/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=theory-yes-grand-theory-of-product-no</link>
		<comments>http://timjmitchell.com/2010/01/07/theory-yes-grand-theory-of-product-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heretech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productonomics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timjmitchell.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A very good post and some really interesting insight, IMO, from The Heretech a few weeks ago about A Grand Theory of PM and its useless pursuit (also cross-posted here at Forrester Blog) .  I couldn&#8217;t agree more, in that the information economy we live is is just too complex and dynamic to try and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://timjmitchell.com/2010/01/07/theory-yes-grand-theory-of-product-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
